ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
The headline may sound strange - but, yesterday, during my first wetplate photoshooting using the Ambrotypie (see information here) de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambrotyp… technique I felt like this way of working felt much closer to the digital work flow in taking photographs and seeing them immediatly on the display than 35mm.
Even though we just took 8 pictures in about 8 hours, the process of working on the pose, coating the plate with the chemicals in the dark room, 12 seconds to burn the image into the lightsensitive glass surface, back to the darkroom, and in nothing more than 3 minutes we where able to see the final result when holding the glass in front of a dark paper.
So why everybody says digital is that fast when some spend hours in front of the computer to get a final result?
And to take 36 good 35mm images mostly does not have the same good results in the quantity compared to the wetplate process - because we tend to work to fast?
And the 35 mm film needs to be developed (which mostly takes more than 1 minute...) and scanned and / or printed in the darkroom. So the process is cheaper, to take a picture may just take 1/4 seconds, but the process at all still takes a lot of time.
Is the "new technology" really a step forward when having in mind all the functions and overall the quality and endurance of the material?
Of course it's all about light and the intensity of the light and we where lucky with a 12 seconds light situation....and the plate has to dry now, needs to be varnished... but we will hardly get the idea to use pen and pencil to rework anything on this image hours later...
I would like to talk about your experiences with you and feel free to show us some of your work taken in any analog way and tell us the story from the first idea to the final picture!
Useful Links (feel free to send more!)
www.facebook.com/groups/collod… - facebook group for collodion friends
kollodium.blogspot.de/ (german) - Andreas Reh, Wetplate photographers blog with a lot of technical useful information
:thumb161006672:
:thumb161055846: :thumb284886085: :thumb338418720:
:thumb368593379: :thumb415650672:
Tabea.
Even though we just took 8 pictures in about 8 hours, the process of working on the pose, coating the plate with the chemicals in the dark room, 12 seconds to burn the image into the lightsensitive glass surface, back to the darkroom, and in nothing more than 3 minutes we where able to see the final result when holding the glass in front of a dark paper.
So why everybody says digital is that fast when some spend hours in front of the computer to get a final result?
And to take 36 good 35mm images mostly does not have the same good results in the quantity compared to the wetplate process - because we tend to work to fast?
And the 35 mm film needs to be developed (which mostly takes more than 1 minute...) and scanned and / or printed in the darkroom. So the process is cheaper, to take a picture may just take 1/4 seconds, but the process at all still takes a lot of time.
Is the "new technology" really a step forward when having in mind all the functions and overall the quality and endurance of the material?
Of course it's all about light and the intensity of the light and we where lucky with a 12 seconds light situation....and the plate has to dry now, needs to be varnished... but we will hardly get the idea to use pen and pencil to rework anything on this image hours later...
I would like to talk about your experiences with you and feel free to show us some of your work taken in any analog way and tell us the story from the first idea to the final picture!
Useful Links (feel free to send more!)
www.facebook.com/groups/collod… - facebook group for collodion friends
kollodium.blogspot.de/ (german) - Andreas Reh, Wetplate photographers blog with a lot of technical useful information
:thumb161006672:
:thumb161055846: :thumb284886085: :thumb338418720:
:thumb368593379: :thumb415650672:
Tabea.
New Folders
New folders have been added, old ones closed!
The new folders have easy-to-understand names: 110, 35mm colour/mono, 44 -645 through 67 colour/mono, bigger than 67, and so on.
Wish you all lots of fun with your analogue experiences. Your pics are welcome!
Large Formats and your thin wallet
anyone out there who wants to do some experiments?
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1436129614/intrepid-8x10-camera-an-affordable-large-format-ca
Kodak revives Ektachrome E100
A great announcement was made by Kodak!
They are going to bring back Ektachrome E100 colour reversal/slide film! after it was cancelled in 2012
http://www.kodak.com/us/en/corp/press_center/kodak_brings_back_a_classic_with_ektachrome_film/default.htm
35mm still and Super-8 format! If everything goes as planned the first batch should be ready in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Hopefully the galleries will get some brand new Ektachrome E100 photos soon.
Happy shooting!
dutchstreammachine
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Our best wishes from the staff of AnalogPhotographers for all you loveley members =)
Happy New Year !
Peace :peace:
Featured in Groups
© 2014 - 2024 AnalogPhotographers
Comments12
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Great feature, Tabea. I also noticed that I spend a lot less time in front of the computer since working in the analog field again. And shoot a lot less fotos. Most of my fotos exist in only a single version (I hardly ever make two shots of the same subject), because there is so much to consider before hitting the trigger that I'm very confident that it works. And it usually does. This is something quite unknown in the digital arena, at least from my experience. And very gratifying.
I really like the wet plate technique you presented here, this is definitly on my list for the future. Very inspiring, thanks for sharing these thoughts!
Cheers,
Mark
I really like the wet plate technique you presented here, this is definitly on my list for the future. Very inspiring, thanks for sharing these thoughts!
Cheers,
Mark